Skip to content

How Walkerston - Eton voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Capricornia · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Walkerston - Eton favoured Coalition 61.7% (v Labor 38.3%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.8 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 39.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Walkerston - Eton

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 69.6Coal 62.5Coal 61.7Lab +0.8
Labor17.0%22.9%26.6%+3.7
Coalition42.9%41.4%39.5%-1.9
Greens3.1%3.9%4.4%+0.5
One Nation18.9%19.7%15.3%-4.4
Independents2.4%3.6%0.0%-3.6
Others15.7%8.5%14.2%+5.7

2021 Census profile

IndicatorWalkerston - EtonTypical area
Median age3839
Median household income ($/week)$2,105$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %7.9%21.4%
No religion %34.2%44.7%
Renting (all) %17.4%27.2%
Owned outright %37.4%32.7%
Born overseas %6.6%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %2.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 8,457 (6,340 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Mackay CAPRICORNIA PPVCPPVC38%
WalkerstonOrdinary22%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal11%
EtonOrdinary6%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent5%
ChelonaOrdinary5%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
Sarina PPVCPPVC3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Capricornia

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.