Skip to content

How Lakes Creek voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Capricornia · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Lakes Creek favoured Coalition 50.8% (v Labor 49.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.3 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 36.0%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Lakes Creek

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 57.5Coal 53.1Coal 50.8Lab +2.3
Labor27.7%31.9%36.0%+4.1
Coalition37.9%37.1%33.5%-3.6
Greens5.4%6.4%7.2%+0.8
One Nation15.8%12.6%14.9%+2.4
Independents2.9%3.4%0.0%-3.4
Others10.4%8.7%8.4%-0.2

2021 Census profile

IndicatorLakes CreekTypical area
Median age3539
Median household income ($/week)$1,374$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %9.0%21.4%
No religion %45.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %35.0%27.2%
Owned outright %27.7%32.7%
Born overseas %13.6%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %10.4%12.5%

Usual residents: 4,880 (3,708 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Rockhampton CAPRICORNIA PPVCPPVC39%
KoongalOrdinary19%yes
Lakes CreekOrdinary17%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal10%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent2%
BerserkerOrdinary2%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll2%
Frenchville SouthOrdinary1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Capricornia

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.