Skip to content

How Seaford (Vic.) voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Dunkley · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Seaford (Vic.) favoured Labor 59.2% (v Coalition 40.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.4 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 38.9%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Seaford (Vic.)

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 56.7Lab 58.8Lab 59.2Lab +0.4
Labor40.9%41.4%38.9%-2.4
Coalition35.7%29.6%30.1%+0.6
Greens9.6%11.4%12.5%+1.1
One Nation0.0%3.0%6.8%+3.8
Independents0.0%4.2%3.1%-1.0
Others13.8%10.4%8.5%-1.9

2021 Census profile

IndicatorSeaford (Vic.)Typical area
Median age4039
Median household income ($/week)$1,500$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %20.4%21.4%
No religion %56.3%44.7%
Renting (all) %33.5%27.2%
Owned outright %28.0%32.7%
Born overseas %21.1%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %10.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 17,215 (13,693 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
PostalDeclaration: Postal19%
Carrum Downs DUNKLEY PPVCPPVC16%
Seaford EastOrdinary13%yes
Frankston DUNKLEY PPVCPPVC12%
SeafordOrdinary10%yes
Seaford NorthOrdinary9%yes
Seaford SouthOrdinary8%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Dunkley

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.