Skip to content

How Frankston voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Dunkley · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Frankston favoured Labor 58.2% (v Coalition 41.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.2 points to the Coalition since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 38.1%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Frankston

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 54.6Lab 58.4Lab 58.2Coal +0.2
Labor39.4%41.1%38.1%-3.0
Coalition38.2%30.0%31.1%+1.1
Greens9.5%11.6%12.8%+1.2
One Nation0.0%2.7%6.5%+3.8
Independents0.0%4.2%3.2%-1.0
Others12.9%10.3%8.2%-2.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorFrankstonTypical area
Median age3939
Median household income ($/week)$1,383$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %20.3%21.4%
No religion %56.1%44.7%
Renting (all) %43.1%27.2%
Owned outright %24.5%32.7%
Born overseas %24.8%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %14.1%12.5%

Usual residents: 23,586 (19,014 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Frankston DUNKLEY PPVCPPVC32%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal18%
Frankston Heights EastOrdinary7%yes
Frankston HeightsOrdinary7%yes
FrankstonOrdinary5%yes
Frankston RailOrdinary4%yes
Frankston CentralOrdinary4%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Dunkley

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.