Skip to content

How Langwarrin voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Dunkley · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Langwarrin favoured Labor 55.1% (v Coalition 44.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.3 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 37.2%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Langwarrin

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 50.1Lab 54.8Lab 55.1Lab +0.3
Labor36.9%39.6%37.2%-2.5
Coalition42.0%33.6%33.9%+0.2
Greens7.3%9.4%10.8%+1.4
One Nation0.0%3.0%7.5%+4.5
Independents0.0%3.9%2.9%-1.0
Others13.8%10.3%7.7%-2.7

2021 Census profile

IndicatorLangwarrinTypical area
Median age3839
Median household income ($/week)$1,950$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %16.5%21.4%
No religion %57.0%44.7%
Renting (all) %17.3%27.2%
Owned outright %30.9%32.7%
Born overseas %16.6%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %6.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 24,939 (19,028 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
PostalDeclaration: Postal23%
Carrum Downs DUNKLEY PPVCPPVC13%
Frankston DUNKLEY PPVCPPVC13%
LangwarrinOrdinary11%yes
Langwarrin ParkOrdinary10%yes
Langwarrin CentralOrdinary8%yes
Langwarrin NorthOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Dunkley

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.