Skip to content

How Waterford West voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Forde · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Waterford West favoured Labor 56.1% (v Coalition 43.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 5.7 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 38.4%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Waterford West

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 53.4Lab 50.4Lab 56.1Lab +5.7
Labor34.3%32.2%38.4%+6.2
Coalition38.1%32.8%27.1%-5.7
Greens8.3%9.9%11.5%+1.6
One Nation12.6%8.4%9.6%+1.1
Independents0.0%3.0%2.9%-0.1
Others6.7%13.7%10.5%-3.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorWaterford WestTypical area
Median age3539
Median household income ($/week)$1,257$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %9.4%21.4%
No religion %40.0%44.7%
Renting (all) %41.0%27.2%
Owned outright %25.6%32.7%
Born overseas %34.8%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %21.2%12.5%

Usual residents: 7,815 (5,760 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
PostalDeclaration: Postal22%
Crestmead FORDE PPVCPPVC21%
Waterford WestOrdinary14%yes
Marsden (Forde)Ordinary13%yes
Woodridge FORDE PPVCPPVC11%
Beenleigh FORDE PPVCPPVC4%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Forde

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.