Skip to content

How Cornubia - Carbrook voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Forde · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Cornubia - Carbrook favoured Coalition 51.7% (v Labor 48.3%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 6.3 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 34.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Cornubia - Carbrook

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 63.0Coal 58.0Coal 51.7Lab +6.3
Labor26.5%25.4%31.8%+6.4
Coalition50.1%41.4%34.5%-6.8
Greens8.7%9.8%11.1%+1.2
One Nation9.6%7.4%9.6%+2.2
Independents0.0%2.8%2.7%-0.1
Others5.1%13.2%10.3%-2.9

2021 Census profile

IndicatorCornubia - CarbrookTypical area
Median age4139
Median household income ($/week)$2,315$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %22.1%21.4%
No religion %42.5%44.7%
Renting (all) %13.7%27.2%
Owned outright %33.3%32.7%
Born overseas %24.2%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %9.2%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,076 (6,899 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
CornubiaOrdinary26%yes
Loganholme PPVCPPVC22%
PostalDeclaration: Postal17%
CarbrookOrdinary9%yes
Beenleigh FORDE PPVCPPVC5%
Woodridge FORDE PPVCPPVC5%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll4%
Shailer ParkOrdinary4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Forde

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.