Skip to content

How Rockingham voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: Brand · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Rockingham favoured Labor 65.4% (v Coalition 34.6%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.9 points to the Coalition since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 45.4%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Rockingham

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 55.8Lab 66.4Lab 65.4Coal +0.9
Labor41.8%51.0%45.4%-5.6
Coalition30.5%22.9%21.2%-1.7
Greens9.7%10.5%12.1%+1.6
One Nation8.6%5.4%13.0%+7.6
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others9.4%10.2%8.3%-1.9

2021 Census profile

IndicatorRockinghamTypical area
Median age4739
Median household income ($/week)$1,147$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %10.7%21.4%
No religion %48.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %37.1%27.2%
Owned outright %35.1%32.7%
Born overseas %36.8%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %11.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 16,411 (14,043 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Rockingham Central PPVCPPVC49%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal11%
Rockingham NorthOrdinary9%yes
RockinghamOrdinary9%yes
Rockingham CentralOrdinary5%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll4%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Safety BayOrdinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Brand

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.