Skip to content

How Parmelia - Orelia voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: Brand · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Parmelia - Orelia favoured Labor 71.6% (v Coalition 28.4%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.9 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 49.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Parmelia - Orelia

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 62.5Lab 70.7Lab 71.6Lab +0.9
Labor44.7%53.2%49.7%-3.6
Coalition24.2%18.2%15.8%-2.4
Greens11.6%11.8%14.1%+2.3
One Nation8.7%5.4%11.8%+6.5
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others10.8%11.4%8.5%-2.8

2021 Census profile

IndicatorParmelia - OreliaTypical area
Median age3739
Median household income ($/week)$1,293$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %9.3%21.4%
No religion %53.0%44.7%
Renting (all) %31.2%27.2%
Owned outright %23.0%32.7%
Born overseas %33.1%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %17.2%12.5%

Usual residents: 11,286 (8,652 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Kwinana Town Centre PPVCPPVC46%yes
ParmeliaOrdinary11%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal10%
Wellard CentralOrdinary8%yes
CalistaOrdinary6%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent4%
MedinaOrdinary4%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Brand

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.