Skip to content

How Warradale voted

SA2 area in South Australia · federal division: Boothby · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Warradale favoured Labor 61.6% (v Coalition 38.4%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 8.8 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 43.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Warradale

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 51.1Lab 52.8Lab 61.6Lab +8.8
Labor35.8%32.9%43.5%+10.6
Coalition44.6%38.0%31.9%-6.1
Greens10.8%14.8%16.5%+1.7
One Nation0.0%2.1%3.2%+1.1
Independents2.5%7.0%0.0%-7.0
Others6.3%5.2%4.8%-0.4

2021 Census profile

IndicatorWarradaleTypical area
Median age3939
Median household income ($/week)$1,421$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %28.2%21.4%
No religion %51.3%44.7%
Renting (all) %35.8%27.2%
Owned outright %28.3%32.7%
Born overseas %30.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %21.9%12.5%

Usual residents: 16,190 (13,271 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Brighton BOOTHBY PPVCPPVC24%
PostalDeclaration: Postal15%
Oaklands ParkOrdinary8%yes
WarradaleOrdinary8%yes
Seacombe GardensOrdinary6%yes
Somerton Park EastOrdinary5%yes
Seacombe HeightsOrdinary5%
Plympton Park BOOTHBY PPVCPPVC4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Boothby

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.