Skip to content

How Mitcham (SA) voted

SA2 area in South Australia · federal division: Boothby · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Mitcham (SA) favoured Labor 58.7% (v Coalition 41.3%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 7.4 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 40.6%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Mitcham (SA)

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 55.2Lab 51.3Lab 58.7Lab +7.4
Labor30.8%29.7%40.6%+10.9
Coalition49.6%40.8%35.6%-5.2
Greens12.1%15.3%17.2%+2.0
One Nation0.0%1.6%2.5%+0.8
Independents3.0%8.3%0.0%-8.3
Others4.4%4.3%4.0%-0.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorMitcham (SA)Typical area
Median age4439
Median household income ($/week)$2,203$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %46.0%21.4%
No religion %49.9%44.7%
Renting (all) %18.6%27.2%
Owned outright %42.5%32.7%
Born overseas %21.9%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %13.6%12.5%

Usual residents: 16,506 (12,969 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Colonel Light Gardens BOOTHBY PPVCPPVC18%
MitchamOrdinary15%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal14%
Hawthorn WestOrdinary8%yes
Myrtle Bank BOOTHBY PPVCPPVC8%
KingswoodOrdinary8%yes
Colonel Light GardensOrdinary5%
ClaphamOrdinary5%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Boothby

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.