Skip to content

How Ulverstone voted

SA2 area in Tasmania · federal division: Braddon · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Ulverstone favoured Labor 57.8% (v Coalition 42.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 16.6 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 41.6%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Ulverstone

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 55.5Coal 58.8Lab 57.8Lab +16.6
Labor30.6%21.6%41.6%+19.9
Coalition43.9%45.1%31.4%-13.8
Greens4.4%6.8%8.2%+1.4
One Nation5.6%4.3%7.3%+3.1
Independents11.0%5.8%7.3%+1.5
Others4.4%16.3%4.2%-12.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorUlverstoneTypical area
Median age4939
Median household income ($/week)$1,039$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %12.6%21.4%
No religion %52.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %25.7%27.2%
Owned outright %44.4%32.7%
Born overseas %9.3%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %4.3%12.5%

Usual residents: 7,088 (5,767 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Ulverstone PPVCPPVC31%yes
Ulverstone SouthOrdinary20%yes
Ulverstone EastOrdinary10%yes
Ulverstone CentralOrdinary10%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal8%
GawlerOrdinary5%yes
East Devonport BRADDON PPVCPPVC3%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Braddon

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.