Skip to content

How Port Sorell voted

SA2 area in Tasmania · federal division: Braddon · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Port Sorell favoured Labor 53.8% (v Coalition 46.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 14.2 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 37.6%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Port Sorell

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 57.1Coal 60.4Lab 53.8Lab +14.2
Labor29.2%21.6%37.6%+16.0
Coalition45.6%47.1%35.9%-11.2
Greens5.7%7.6%8.1%+0.5
One Nation5.4%3.9%6.9%+2.9
Independents9.5%6.0%7.8%+1.8
Others4.5%13.7%3.8%-10.0

2021 Census profile

IndicatorPort SorellTypical area
Median age5239
Median household income ($/week)$1,279$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %14.7%21.4%
No religion %52.7%44.7%
Renting (all) %19.2%27.2%
Owned outright %49.7%32.7%
Born overseas %12.3%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %4.2%12.5%

Usual residents: 6,472 (5,325 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
East Devonport BRADDON PPVCPPVC25%
Port SorellOrdinary22%yes
Port Sorell WestOrdinary18%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal11%
Wesley ValeOrdinary5%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll4%
MoriartyOrdinary2%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Braddon

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.