Skip to content

How South Coogee voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Kingsford Smith · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of South Coogee favoured Labor 64.8% (v Coalition 35.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.0 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 49.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like South Coogee

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 53.4Lab 60.7Lab 64.8Lab +4.0
Labor40.5%44.7%49.7%+5.0
Coalition42.3%32.6%29.3%-3.4
Greens11.6%16.5%12.2%-4.3
One Nation0.0%2.8%5.2%+2.3
Independents0.0%0.0%3.6%+3.6
Others5.6%3.4%0.0%-3.4

2021 Census profile

IndicatorSouth CoogeeTypical area
Median age4239
Median household income ($/week)$2,105$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %38.6%21.4%
No religion %34.5%44.7%
Renting (all) %47.4%27.2%
Owned outright %25.2%32.7%
Born overseas %34.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %21.8%12.5%

Usual residents: 5,611 (4,264 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Coogee SouthOrdinary29%yes
Maroubra PPVCPPVC21%
Randwick KINGSFORD SMITH PPVCPPVC13%
PostalDeclaration: Postal10%
Coogee EastOrdinary8%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
CoogeeOrdinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Kingsford Smith

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.