Skip to content

How Maroubra - North voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Kingsford Smith · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Maroubra - North favoured Labor 66.1% (v Coalition 33.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.9 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 50.9%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Maroubra - North

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 55.8Lab 62.2Lab 66.1Lab +3.9
Labor42.5%46.8%50.9%+4.1
Coalition39.7%31.0%27.9%-3.1
Greens11.7%15.4%12.3%-3.2
One Nation0.0%3.2%5.4%+2.2
Independents0.0%0.0%3.5%+3.5
Others6.1%3.5%0.0%-3.5

2021 Census profile

IndicatorMaroubra - NorthTypical area
Median age4139
Median household income ($/week)$2,415$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %42.2%21.4%
No religion %33.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %32.2%27.2%
Owned outright %38.0%32.7%
Born overseas %40.3%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %29.2%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,790 (7,890 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Maroubra PPVCPPVC41%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal11%
Maroubra JunctionOrdinary9%
Maroubra BayOrdinary7%
MaroubraOrdinary5%
Coogee SouthOrdinary5%
Maroubra CentralOrdinary5%yes
Maroubra EastOrdinary4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Kingsford Smith

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.