Skip to content

How Slacks Creek voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Rankin · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Slacks Creek favoured Labor 66.2% (v Coalition 33.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.5 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 50.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Slacks Creek

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 60.1Lab 61.7Lab 66.2Lab +4.5
Labor44.8%46.1%50.7%+4.5
Coalition27.2%25.8%19.0%-6.8
Greens8.6%10.3%9.8%-0.5
One Nation9.2%8.7%7.0%-1.6
Independents1.6%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others8.5%9.1%13.6%+4.5

2021 Census profile

IndicatorSlacks CreekTypical area
Median age3539
Median household income ($/week)$1,301$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %10.7%21.4%
No religion %43.0%44.7%
Renting (all) %44.2%27.2%
Owned outright %21.7%32.7%
Born overseas %33.2%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %20.6%12.5%

Usual residents: 10,408 (7,758 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Woodridge RANKIN PPVCPPVC51%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal14%
Mabel ParkOrdinary13%yes
Logan RANKIN PPVCPPVC4%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Woodridge EastOrdinary3%
Slacks Creek (Rankin)Ordinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Rankin

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.