Skip to content

How Ringwood North voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Deakin · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Ringwood North favoured Labor 51.2% (v Coalition 48.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.8 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 40.9%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Ringwood North

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 56.2Coal 51.6Lab 51.2Lab +2.8
Labor31.3%31.5%33.0%+1.5
Coalition49.7%43.1%40.9%-2.2
Greens9.1%14.2%11.9%-2.3
One Nation0.0%2.0%2.4%+0.4
Independents1.7%1.1%7.5%+6.3
Others8.1%8.1%4.4%-3.7

2021 Census profile

IndicatorRingwood NorthTypical area
Median age4339
Median household income ($/week)$2,330$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %34.2%21.4%
No religion %45.7%44.7%
Renting (all) %12.2%27.2%
Owned outright %42.9%32.7%
Born overseas %23.1%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %16.1%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,654 (7,479 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Ringwood DEAKIN PPVCPPVC36%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal20%
Ringwood NorthOrdinary17%yes
Ringwood HeightsOrdinary12%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent2%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll2%
Ringwood CentralOrdinary2%
WarranwoodOrdinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Deakin

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.