Skip to content

How Mosman - South voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Warringah · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Mosman - South favoured Coalition 51.1% (v Labor 48.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.6 points to Labor since 2022. Independents led first preferences with 40.8%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Mosman - South

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 55.2Coal 54.7Coal 51.1Lab +3.6
Labor5.7%7.8%11.8%+4.0
Coalition41.2%36.9%36.9%+0.0
Greens5.1%5.7%6.6%+1.0
One Nation0.0%1.5%1.6%+0.1
Independents45.2%44.9%40.8%-4.1
Others2.7%3.3%2.3%-1.0

2021 Census profile

IndicatorMosman - SouthTypical area
Median age4439
Median household income ($/week)$2,966$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %56.1%21.4%
No religion %42.7%44.7%
Renting (all) %35.2%27.2%
Owned outright %36.4%32.7%
Born overseas %34.9%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %16.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 14,565 (11,489 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Mosman PPVCPPVC36%yes
Mosman BayOrdinary16%yes
MosmanOrdinary9%yes
Mosman CentralOrdinary9%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal9%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll4%
Spit JunctionOrdinary3%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Warringah

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.