Skip to content

How Lithgow Surrounds voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Calare · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Lithgow Surrounds favoured Coalition 61.1% (v Labor 38.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.9 points to Labor since 2022. Independents led first preferences with 38.0%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Lithgow Surrounds

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 60.4Coal 63.9Coal 61.1Lab +2.9
Labor26.5%19.3%12.0%-7.4
Coalition42.5%47.9%29.0%-19.0
Greens5.5%4.3%3.2%-1.0
One Nation0.0%9.6%9.1%-0.5
Independents0.0%14.8%38.0%+23.2
Others25.5%4.1%8.8%+4.7

2021 Census profile

IndicatorLithgow SurroundsTypical area
Median age4739
Median household income ($/week)$1,393$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %12.8%21.4%
No religion %40.5%44.7%
Renting (all) %15.1%27.2%
Owned outright %47.2%32.7%
Born overseas %10.3%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %4.8%12.5%

Usual residents: 8,448 (6,750 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Lithgow PPVCPPVC37%
PortlandOrdinary12%yes
WallerawangOrdinary11%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal9%
HartleyOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
Bathurst PPVCPPVC3%
Cullen BullenOrdinary2%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Calare

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.