Skip to content

How Bathurst Surrounds voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Calare · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Bathurst Surrounds favoured Coalition 63.9% (v Labor 36.1%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 1.5 points to Labor since 2022. Independents led first preferences with 38.1%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Bathurst Surrounds

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 63.2Coal 65.4Coal 63.9Lab +1.5
Labor24.2%14.2%9.4%-4.7
Coalition46.4%48.1%33.8%-14.3
Greens6.2%4.8%3.4%-1.4
One Nation0.0%8.4%7.5%-0.9
Independents0.0%21.3%38.1%+16.8
Others23.2%3.3%7.9%+4.6

2021 Census profile

IndicatorBathurst SurroundsTypical area
Median age4739
Median household income ($/week)$1,835$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %19.1%21.4%
No religion %34.6%44.7%
Renting (all) %9.0%27.2%
Owned outright %47.2%32.7%
Born overseas %8.3%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %3.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 6,909 (5,416 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Bathurst PPVCPPVC38%
PerthvilleOrdinary8%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal7%
Bathurst Windradyne PPVCPPVC6%
O'ConnellOrdinary5%yes
Bathurst EglintonOrdinary4%
Wattle FlatOrdinary4%yes
YetholmeOrdinary3%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Calare

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.