Skip to content

How Geraldton - North voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: Durack · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Geraldton - North favoured Coalition 62.9% (v Labor 37.1%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 5.5 points to the Coalition since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 51.0%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Geraldton - North

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 67.6Coal 57.4Coal 62.9Coal +5.5
Labor20.5%26.6%22.1%-4.6
Coalition56.9%50.3%51.0%+0.7
Greens6.5%9.0%7.0%-2.1
One Nation10.3%6.4%8.7%+2.3
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others5.8%7.6%11.2%+3.6

2021 Census profile

IndicatorGeraldton - NorthTypical area
Median age3639
Median household income ($/week)$1,915$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %12.1%21.4%
No religion %50.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %25.2%27.2%
Owned outright %30.8%32.7%
Born overseas %14.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %5.0%12.5%

Usual residents: 8,546 (6,205 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Geraldton PPVCPPVC41%
WaggrakineOrdinary19%yes
Drummond CoveOrdinary10%yes
Bluff PointOrdinary6%
PostalDeclaration: Postal5%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
GeraldtonOrdinary3%
WonthellaOrdinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Durack

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.