Skip to content

How Exmouth voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: Durack · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Exmouth favoured Coalition 58.0% (v Labor 42.0%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.7 points to the Coalition since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 43.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Exmouth

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 61.9Coal 53.3Coal 58.0Coal +4.7
Labor17.0%26.9%20.7%-6.2
Coalition44.7%43.2%43.7%+0.4
Greens9.6%14.1%12.7%-1.4
One Nation7.6%6.7%11.3%+4.7
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others21.0%9.0%11.6%+2.5

2021 Census profile

IndicatorExmouthTypical area
Median age3739
Median household income ($/week)$1,727$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %17.4%21.4%
No religion %64.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %40.5%27.2%
Owned outright %27.2%32.7%
Born overseas %21.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %9.6%12.5%

Usual residents: 4,659 (3,718 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
ExmouthOrdinary43%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal19%
DenhamOrdinary12%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll8%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent5%
Remote Mobile Team 5Remote Mobile Team3%
Remote Mobile Team 9Remote Mobile Team2%
Carnarvon PPVCPPVC1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Durack

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.