Skip to content

How Geebung voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Lilley · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Geebung favoured Labor 64.8% (v Coalition 35.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.8 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 46.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Geebung

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 51.5Lab 61.0Lab 64.8Lab +3.8
Labor36.9%43.0%46.5%+3.5
Coalition40.5%29.8%27.5%-2.2
Greens13.5%15.8%16.2%+0.5
One Nation5.3%4.5%4.1%-0.4
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others3.8%6.9%5.6%-1.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorGeebungTypical area
Median age3839
Median household income ($/week)$2,164$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %27.8%21.4%
No religion %43.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %26.1%27.2%
Owned outright %31.1%32.7%
Born overseas %18.7%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %9.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 4,541 (3,454 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Geebung LILLEY PPVCPPVC42%yes
GeebungOrdinary20%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal16%
Geebung NorthOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Brisbane Central LILLEY PPVCPPVC1%
Special Hospital Team 3Special Hospital Team1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Lilley

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.