Skip to content

How Everton Park voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Lilley · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Everton Park favoured Labor 64.9% (v Coalition 35.1%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 5.3 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 43.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Everton Park

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 50.9Lab 59.6Lab 64.9Lab +5.3
Labor34.3%39.3%43.7%+4.4
Coalition42.3%30.0%27.2%-2.9
Greens14.4%19.2%19.2%-0.0
One Nation5.2%4.0%4.2%+0.3
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others3.9%7.5%5.7%-1.8

2021 Census profile

IndicatorEverton ParkTypical area
Median age3539
Median household income ($/week)$2,024$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %34.9%21.4%
No religion %45.2%44.7%
Renting (all) %40.0%27.2%
Owned outright %25.3%32.7%
Born overseas %21.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %13.4%12.5%

Usual residents: 10,044 (7,904 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Enoggera LILLEY PPVCPPVC21%
PostalDeclaration: Postal21%
Everton ParkOrdinary19%yes
Chermside West LILLEY PPVCPPVC7%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent6%
Bunya LILLEY PPVCPPVC4%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll4%
Brisbane Central LILLEY PPVCPPVC4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Lilley

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.