Skip to content

How Clayfield voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Brisbane · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Clayfield favoured Labor 53.2% (v Coalition 46.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.3 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 40.0%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Clayfield

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 61.1Coal 51.2Lab 53.2Lab +4.3
Labor22.3%25.7%30.3%+4.6
Coalition54.0%43.4%40.0%-3.5
Greens18.3%23.0%22.0%-1.0
One Nation2.8%2.2%2.7%+0.5
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others2.6%5.6%5.0%-0.6

2021 Census profile

IndicatorClayfieldTypical area
Median age3739
Median household income ($/week)$1,931$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %44.6%21.4%
No religion %39.6%44.7%
Renting (all) %43.6%27.2%
Owned outright %24.5%32.7%
Born overseas %28.2%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %18.4%12.5%

Usual residents: 10,754 (8,768 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
PostalDeclaration: Postal19%
Geebung BRISBANE PPVCPPVC14%
Clayfield WestOrdinary12%yes
Clayfield EastOrdinary11%yes
Clayfield CentralOrdinary8%
Brisbane Central BRISBANE PPVCPPVC7%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll5%
AscotOrdinary5%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Brisbane

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.