Skip to content

How Bentley Park voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Kennedy · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Bentley Park favoured Coalition 52.7% (v Labor 47.3%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 1.3 points to Labor since 2022. Others led first preferences with 36.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Bentley Park

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 57.3Coal 54.1Coal 52.7Lab +1.3
Labor23.3%22.0%22.6%+0.6
Coalition24.6%25.3%22.1%-3.2
Greens7.2%8.6%7.9%-0.8
One Nation0.0%0.0%8.4%+8.4
Independents0.0%4.0%2.3%-1.7
Others44.9%40.0%36.7%-3.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorBentley ParkTypical area
Median age3239
Median household income ($/week)$1,831$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %12.5%21.4%
No religion %46.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %34.4%27.2%
Owned outright %18.0%32.7%
Born overseas %17.9%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %11.1%12.5%

Usual residents: 8,360 (5,756 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Cairns South KENNEDY PPVCPPVC53%
EdmontonOrdinary10%
Cairns KENNEDY PPVCPPVC9%
Bentley Park (Kennedy)Ordinary8%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal8%
Cairns CBD KENNEDY PPVCPPVC3%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Kennedy

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.