Skip to content

How Armadale voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Kooyong · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Armadale favoured Coalition 56.5% (v Labor 43.5%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.1 points to the Coalition since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 48.2%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Armadale

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 59.4Coal 52.3Coal 56.5Coal +4.1
Labor21.3%26.1%11.8%-14.3
Coalition53.5%45.8%48.2%+2.4
Greens21.5%20.9%8.4%-12.4
One Nation0.0%0.0%1.0%+1.0
Independents0.0%0.0%28.4%+28.4
Others3.6%7.3%2.2%-5.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorArmadaleTypical area
Median age3839
Median household income ($/week)$2,207$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %55.8%21.4%
No religion %45.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %44.7%27.2%
Owned outright %30.3%32.7%
Born overseas %30.0%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %20.9%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,336 (7,939 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Malvern KOOYONG PPVCPPVC37%
PostalDeclaration: Postal16%
ArmadaleOrdinary12%yes
Armadale NorthOrdinary8%yes
Armadale CentralOrdinary7%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent5%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll5%
Malvern (Kooyong)Ordinary4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Kooyong

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.