Skip to content

How Altona North voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal divisions: Fraser, Gellibrand · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Altona North favoured Labor 67.5% (v Coalition 32.5%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.0 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 45.4%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Altona North

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 65.7Lab 63.5Lab 67.5Lab +4.0
Labor51.5%44.0%45.4%+1.4
Coalition28.6%24.6%23.7%-0.9
Greens14.2%16.9%20.6%+3.7
One Nation0.0%3.1%5.7%+2.6
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others5.8%11.4%4.7%-6.8

2021 Census profile

IndicatorAltona NorthTypical area
Median age3739
Median household income ($/week)$1,740$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %25.4%21.4%
No religion %31.3%44.7%
Renting (all) %32.7%27.2%
Owned outright %34.0%32.7%
Born overseas %37.3%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %31.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 14,931 (11,662 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Newport GELLIBRAND PPVCPPVC30%
PostalDeclaration: Postal16%
Altona GateOrdinary11%yes
Altona NorthOrdinary10%yes
Altona LakesOrdinary4%yes
Newport FRASER PPVCPPVC4%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Fraser

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.