Skip to content

How West Lakes voted

SA2 area in South Australia · federal division: Hindmarsh · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of West Lakes favoured Labor 64.4% (v Coalition 35.6%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 8.0 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 47.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like West Lakes

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 53.0Lab 56.4Lab 64.4Lab +8.0
Labor40.9%41.4%47.5%+6.2
Coalition40.2%35.3%25.1%-10.2
Greens9.7%12.3%12.3%+0.1
One Nation0.0%3.9%5.0%+1.1
Independents0.0%0.0%1.5%+1.5
Others9.2%7.2%8.5%+1.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorWest LakesTypical area
Median age5139
Median household income ($/week)$1,506$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %22.5%21.4%
No religion %40.9%44.7%
Renting (all) %22.3%27.2%
Owned outright %45.0%32.7%
Born overseas %24.0%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %14.4%12.5%

Usual residents: 15,205 (12,779 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
West Lakes HINDMARSH PPVCPPVC24%
West Lakes ShoreOrdinary22%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal14%
Port Adelaide HINDMARSH PPVCPPVC12%
Semaphore ParkOrdinary4%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
SeatonOrdinary3%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Hindmarsh

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.