Skip to content

How Wellington Point voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Bowman · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Wellington Point favoured Coalition 52.8% (v Labor 47.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.8 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 41.0%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Wellington Point

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 61.7Coal 56.5Coal 52.8Lab +3.8
Labor25.7%28.8%31.6%+2.8
Coalition51.1%44.4%41.0%-3.5
Greens11.9%12.9%12.2%-0.7
One Nation6.3%7.0%6.3%-0.7
Independents0.0%0.0%3.0%+3.0
Others5.0%6.9%6.0%-0.9

2021 Census profile

IndicatorWellington PointTypical area
Median age4339
Median household income ($/week)$2,173$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %23.9%21.4%
No religion %41.0%44.7%
Renting (all) %20.9%27.2%
Owned outright %36.0%32.7%
Born overseas %25.4%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %7.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 11,893 (9,148 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Birkdale BOWMAN PPVCPPVC29%
Cleveland PPVCPPVC17%
PostalDeclaration: Postal16%
Wellington Point WestOrdinary14%yes
Wellington PointOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
BirkdaleOrdinary3%
OrmistonOrdinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Bowman

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.