Skip to content

How Victor Harbor voted

SA2 area in South Australia · federal division: Mayo · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Victor Harbor favoured Labor 50.7% (v Coalition 49.3%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.8 points to Labor since 2022. Others led first preferences with 38.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Victor Harbor

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 55.2Coal 53.1Lab 50.7Lab +3.8
Labor10.6%16.2%19.8%+3.6
Coalition39.6%30.0%26.3%-3.7
Greens6.6%8.0%9.8%+1.8
One Nation0.0%4.0%5.6%+1.7
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others43.2%41.9%38.5%-3.4

2021 Census profile

IndicatorVictor HarborTypical area
Median age6039
Median household income ($/week)$977$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %15.5%21.4%
No religion %51.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %21.2%27.2%
Owned outright %51.3%32.7%
Born overseas %20.4%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %5.7%12.5%

Usual residents: 15,847 (13,542 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Victor Harbor PPVCPPVC54%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal13%
Victor HarborOrdinary8%yes
Victor Harbor SouthOrdinary8%yes
Victor Harbor EastOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll2%
Port ElliotOrdinary2%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Mayo

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.