Skip to content

How Surry Hills voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Sydney · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Surry Hills favoured Labor 77.9% (v Coalition 22.1%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.0 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 55.8%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Surry Hills

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 69.9Lab 76.0Lab 77.9Lab +2.0
Labor50.7%52.2%55.8%+3.6
Coalition25.4%19.4%17.7%-1.7
Greens17.8%22.4%21.0%-1.3
One Nation0.0%1.7%3.3%+1.6
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others6.1%4.4%2.1%-2.2

2021 Census profile

IndicatorSurry HillsTypical area
Median age3539
Median household income ($/week)$2,308$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %54.9%21.4%
No religion %62.1%44.7%
Renting (all) %66.3%27.2%
Owned outright %13.9%32.7%
Born overseas %47.6%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %31.1%12.5%

Usual residents: 15,828 (14,868 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Haymarket SYDNEY PPVCPPVC21%
Surry Hills NorthOrdinary12%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal10%
Surry Hills SouthOrdinary9%yes
Surry HillsOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll7%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent6%
Surry Hills WestOrdinary5%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Sydney

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.