Skip to content

How Red Hill (ACT) voted

SA2 area in Australian Capital Territory · federal division: Canberra · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Red Hill (ACT) favoured Labor 72.1% (v Coalition 27.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.8 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 48.6%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Red Hill (ACT)

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 61.6Lab 68.2Lab 72.1Lab +3.8
Labor39.4%44.6%48.6%+4.0
Coalition33.4%26.9%22.3%-4.6
Greens19.4%20.5%15.4%-5.1
One Nation0.0%1.1%0.0%-1.1
Independents4.5%5.4%11.3%+6.0
Others3.4%1.5%2.4%+0.9

2021 Census profile

IndicatorRed Hill (ACT)Typical area
Median age4239
Median household income ($/week)$3,938$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %55.1%21.4%
No religion %42.2%44.7%
Renting (all) %22.1%27.2%
Owned outright %39.8%32.7%
Born overseas %29.6%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %22.1%12.5%

Usual residents: 3,146 (2,344 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Red HillOrdinary38%yes
Parkes CANBERRA PPVCPPVC16%
Woden CANBERRA PPVCPPVC11%
PostalDeclaration: Postal9%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll6%
City CANBERRA PPVCPPVC2%
Parkes (Canberra)Ordinary2%
DeakinOrdinary2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Canberra

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.