Skip to content

How North Mackay voted

SA2 area in Queensland · federal division: Dawson · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of North Mackay favoured Coalition 57.6% (v Labor 42.4%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 1.8 points to the Coalition since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 37.0%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like North Mackay

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 62.1Coal 55.8Coal 57.6Coal +1.8
Labor22.8%28.2%29.2%+1.0
Coalition41.8%38.2%37.0%-1.1
Greens3.9%7.5%7.7%+0.2
One Nation14.1%14.3%10.1%-4.2
Independents2.8%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others14.6%11.8%15.9%+4.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorNorth MackayTypical area
Median age4039
Median household income ($/week)$1,372$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %12.2%21.4%
No religion %41.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %37.3%27.2%
Owned outright %27.4%32.7%
Born overseas %13.2%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %7.3%12.5%

Usual residents: 6,283 (4,996 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Mackay DAWSON PPVCPPVC46%
Mackay Goose PondsOrdinary12%yes
Mount Pleasant EastOrdinary11%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal9%
MackayOrdinary4%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
Mackay North PPVCPPVC3%
Andergrove SouthOrdinary3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Dawson

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.