Skip to content

How McKail - Willyung voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: O'Connor · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of McKail - Willyung favoured Coalition 60.4% (v Labor 39.6%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 6.4 points to the Coalition since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 44.2%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like McKail - Willyung

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 62.8Coal 54.0Coal 60.4Coal +6.4
Labor22.1%27.4%22.3%-5.1
Coalition50.6%40.2%44.2%+4.0
Greens10.2%13.5%12.2%-1.3
One Nation7.1%5.8%8.2%+2.3
Independents0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others10.0%13.1%13.1%+0.0

2021 Census profile

IndicatorMcKail - WillyungTypical area
Median age3939
Median household income ($/week)$1,387$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %9.5%21.4%
No religion %54.6%44.7%
Renting (all) %26.2%27.2%
Owned outright %31.5%32.7%
Born overseas %18.2%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %8.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 11,333 (8,431 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Albany PPVCPPVC48%
LockyerOrdinary17%yes
YakamiaOrdinary8%
PostalDeclaration: Postal7%
Centennial ParkOrdinary3%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
AlbanyOrdinary2%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in O'Connor

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.