Skip to content

How Lynbrook - Lyndhurst voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Holt · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Lynbrook - Lyndhurst favoured Labor 65.7% (v Coalition 34.3%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 6.6 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 47.1%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Lynbrook - Lyndhurst

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 60.5Lab 59.1Lab 65.7Lab +6.6
Labor52.9%43.8%47.1%+3.3
Coalition34.4%28.8%24.6%-4.2
Greens6.8%8.2%11.7%+3.5
One Nation0.0%3.9%7.1%+3.2
Independents0.0%3.0%0.0%-3.0
Others5.9%12.4%9.4%-2.9

2021 Census profile

IndicatorLynbrook - LyndhurstTypical area
Median age3339
Median household income ($/week)$2,330$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %29.7%21.4%
No religion %18.7%44.7%
Renting (all) %20.6%27.2%
Owned outright %14.9%32.7%
Born overseas %55.9%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %51.3%12.5%

Usual residents: 18,027 (12,720 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Cranbourne HOLT PPVCPPVC22%
LyndhurstOrdinary19%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal16%
LynbrookOrdinary11%yes
Lynbrook HOLT PPVCPPVC10%
Lynbrook SouthOrdinary8%yes
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Dandenong HOLT PPVCPPVC3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Holt

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.