Skip to content

How Longford - Loch Sport voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Gippsland · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Longford - Loch Sport favoured Coalition 72.6% (v Labor 27.4%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.4 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 57.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Longford - Loch Sport

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 68.9Coal 73.0Coal 72.6Lab +0.4
Labor22.1%17.5%19.4%+1.9
Coalition56.4%56.4%57.5%+1.1
Greens5.0%7.5%7.2%-0.3
One Nation0.0%9.6%13.0%+3.4
Independents2.7%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others13.8%9.0%2.9%-6.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorLongford - Loch SportTypical area
Median age5239
Median household income ($/week)$1,079$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %15.0%21.4%
No religion %50.0%44.7%
Renting (all) %7.9%27.2%
Owned outright %55.7%32.7%
Born overseas %14.4%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %6.4%12.5%

Usual residents: 4,915 (4,083 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Sale PPVCPPVC43%
Loch SportOrdinary12%yes
LongfordOrdinary9%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal7%
Golden BeachOrdinary7%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll5%
SaleOrdinary4%
SeasprayOrdinary3%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Gippsland

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.