Skip to content

How Hadspen - Carrick voted

SA2 area in Tasmania · federal division: Lyons · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Hadspen - Carrick favoured Labor 55.4% (v Coalition 44.6%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 12.0 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 39.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Hadspen - Carrick

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 54.5Coal 56.5Lab 55.4Lab +12.0
Labor30.4%25.0%39.7%+14.7
Coalition49.0%45.5%31.5%-14.0
Greens7.0%9.3%9.0%-0.3
One Nation7.8%5.8%7.5%+1.7
Independents0.0%0.0%3.2%+3.2
Others5.8%14.3%9.2%-5.2

2021 Census profile

IndicatorHadspen - CarrickTypical area
Median age3939
Median household income ($/week)$1,581$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %13.2%21.4%
No religion %54.6%44.7%
Renting (all) %17.1%27.2%
Owned outright %36.5%32.7%
Born overseas %6.7%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %2.0%12.5%

Usual residents: 3,605 (2,746 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
HadspenOrdinary39%yes
Carrick PPVCPPVC17%yes
CarrickOrdinary12%yes
Launceston LYONS PPVCPPVC10%
PostalDeclaration: Postal9%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent5%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll1%
Summerhill (Lyons)Ordinary1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Lyons

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.