Skip to content

How Grindelwald - Lanena voted

SA2 area in Tasmania · federal divisions: Bass, Lyons · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Grindelwald - Lanena favoured Labor 55.8% (v Coalition 44.2%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 9.7 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 37.4%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Grindelwald - Lanena

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 53.9Coal 53.9Lab 55.8Lab +9.7
Labor30.5%26.1%37.4%+11.3
Coalition47.2%40.7%33.1%-7.7
Greens11.1%10.8%13.0%+2.3
One Nation0.0%5.6%7.2%+1.6
Independents4.1%5.7%5.2%-0.5
Others7.1%11.1%4.1%-7.0

2021 Census profile

IndicatorGrindelwald - LanenaTypical area
Median age5039
Median household income ($/week)$1,371$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %18.0%21.4%
No religion %54.1%44.7%
Renting (all) %10.3%27.2%
Owned outright %48.6%32.7%
Born overseas %17.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %5.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 6,136 (4,960 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
ExeterOrdinary22%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal15%
Launceston BASS PPVCPPVC14%
Gravelly BeachOrdinary13%yes
LeganaOrdinary9%
GlengarryOrdinary6%yes
SidmouthOrdinary4%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Bass

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.