Skip to content

How Griffith Surrounds voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal divisions: Farrer, Parkes · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Griffith Surrounds favoured Coalition 68.1% (v Labor 31.9%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.2 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 49.1%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Griffith Surrounds

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 74.6Coal 72.2Coal 68.1Lab +4.2
Labor14.5%16.4%15.4%-1.0
Coalition59.3%58.4%49.1%-9.3
Greens3.0%5.5%3.8%-1.7
One Nation0.0%6.2%7.3%+1.1
Independents16.1%2.8%13.8%+11.0
Others7.1%10.7%10.6%-0.2

2021 Census profile

IndicatorGriffith SurroundsTypical area
Median age4039
Median household income ($/week)$1,630$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %10.6%21.4%
No religion %26.6%44.7%
Renting (all) %22.8%27.2%
Owned outright %40.5%32.7%
Born overseas %11.0%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %8.1%12.5%

Usual residents: 12,760 (9,726 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Griffith PPVCPPVC22%
PostalDeclaration: Postal8%
YendaOrdinary8%yes
Darlington PointOrdinary7%yes
HillstonOrdinary7%yes
HanwoodOrdinary7%yes
ColeamballyOrdinary6%yes
Lake WyanganOrdinary4%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Farrer

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.