Skip to content

How Greenfields voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: Canning · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Greenfields favoured Coalition 56.0% (v Labor 44.0%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.9 points to the Coalition since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 42.5%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Greenfields

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 59.6Coal 53.0Coal 56.0Coal +2.9
Labor30.3%34.4%31.5%-2.9
Coalition48.1%44.3%42.5%-1.8
Greens6.3%6.8%7.9%+1.2
One Nation7.6%4.5%11.0%+6.5
Independents0.0%1.8%0.0%-1.8
Others7.7%8.3%7.1%-1.2

2021 Census profile

IndicatorGreenfieldsTypical area
Median age4739
Median household income ($/week)$1,004$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %7.8%21.4%
No religion %51.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %23.8%27.2%
Owned outright %31.2%32.7%
Born overseas %23.9%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %7.9%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,869 (7,860 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Greenfields CANNING PPVCPPVC56%yes
GreenfieldsOrdinary10%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal10%
Greenfields EastOrdinary7%yes
Mandurah PPVCPPVC6%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent2%
Halls Head PPVCPPVC1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Canning

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.