Skip to content

How Gelorup - Stratham voted

SA2 area in Western Australia · federal division: Forrest · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Gelorup - Stratham favoured Coalition 51.4% (v Labor 48.6%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.7 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 34.4%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Gelorup - Stratham

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 66.3Coal 55.2Coal 51.4Lab +3.7
Labor20.4%27.7%23.1%-4.6
Coalition53.2%44.0%34.4%-9.7
Greens11.7%12.3%6.8%-5.6
One Nation6.0%5.7%9.3%+3.6
Independents2.1%0.0%19.5%+19.5
Others6.5%10.2%6.9%-3.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorGelorup - StrathamTypical area
Median age4639
Median household income ($/week)$2,342$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %20.8%21.4%
No religion %48.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %5.8%27.2%
Owned outright %47.5%32.7%
Born overseas %19.2%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %5.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 3,042 (2,296 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Bunbury FORREST PPVCPPVC38%
Dalyellup SouthOrdinary18%
DalyellupOrdinary14%
PostalDeclaration: Postal8%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent4%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
CapelOrdinary2%
BunburyOrdinary1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Forrest

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.