Skip to content

How Dubbo - South voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Parkes · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Dubbo - South favoured Coalition 63.2% (v Labor 36.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 5.0 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 41.8%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Dubbo - South

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 69.8Coal 68.2Coal 63.2Lab +5.0
Labor21.1%19.8%19.4%-0.4
Coalition53.8%50.7%41.8%-8.9
Greens4.8%5.8%8.3%+2.5
One Nation0.0%6.2%11.3%+5.1
Independents6.2%2.1%2.3%+0.1
Others14.0%15.3%17.0%+1.7

2021 Census profile

IndicatorDubbo - SouthTypical area
Median age3539
Median household income ($/week)$1,662$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %21.9%21.4%
No religion %29.4%44.7%
Renting (all) %37.8%27.2%
Owned outright %27.2%32.7%
Born overseas %13.6%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %11.2%12.5%

Usual residents: 19,628 (14,911 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Dubbo PARKES PPVCPPVC41%yes
Dubbo Wambuul PPVCPPVC13%
Dubbo SouthOrdinary9%yes
Dubbo OranaOrdinary8%yes
Dubbo GroveOrdinary6%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal5%
DubboOrdinary4%yes
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll2%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Parkes

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.