Skip to content

How Creswick - Clunes voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Ballarat · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Creswick - Clunes favoured Labor 58.2% (v Coalition 41.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.9 points to the Coalition since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 40.8%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Creswick - Clunes

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 60.6Lab 61.1Lab 58.2Coal +2.9
Labor47.7%43.5%40.8%-2.7
Coalition31.4%28.4%30.6%+2.2
Greens8.4%13.0%13.3%+0.3
One Nation0.0%3.9%8.8%+4.8
Independents3.8%2.3%2.8%+0.5
Others8.7%8.9%3.7%-5.2

2021 Census profile

IndicatorCreswick - ClunesTypical area
Median age4939
Median household income ($/week)$1,238$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %17.8%21.4%
No religion %52.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %13.9%27.2%
Owned outright %47.4%32.7%
Born overseas %10.9%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %4.6%12.5%

Usual residents: 8,085 (6,498 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Ballarat West PPVCPPVC19%
CreswickOrdinary15%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal15%
ClunesOrdinary13%yes
Creswick NorthOrdinary9%yes
Ballarat BALLARAT PPVCPPVC6%
NewlynOrdinary4%yes
LearmonthOrdinary4%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Ballarat

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.