Skip to content

How Charlemont voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: Corangamite · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Charlemont favoured Labor 60.0% (v Coalition 40.0%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 0.4 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 38.1%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Charlemont

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 51.9Lab 59.5Lab 60.0Lab +0.4
Labor36.8%39.5%38.1%-1.4
Coalition41.5%31.9%32.0%+0.1
Greens8.7%15.7%15.2%-0.4
One Nation0.0%2.5%3.4%+0.9
Independents4.7%0.0%4.0%+4.0
Others8.3%10.5%7.2%-3.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorCharlemontTypical area
Median age3139
Median household income ($/week)$1,988$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %27.4%21.4%
No religion %50.7%44.7%
Renting (all) %28.4%27.2%
Owned outright %15.5%32.7%
Born overseas %19.0%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %13.4%12.5%

Usual residents: 10,300 (7,910 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Torquay CORANGAMITE PPVCPPVC21%
PostalDeclaration: Postal21%
Geelong Central CORANGAMITE PPVCPPVC11%
CharlemontOrdinary11%yes
Grovedale CentralOrdinary7%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent4%
Grovedale EastOrdinary4%
Armstrong Creek EastOrdinary4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Corangamite

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.