Skip to content

How Cessnock Surrounds voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal divisions: Hunter, Paterson · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Cessnock Surrounds favoured Labor 60.5% (v Coalition 39.5%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 4.9 points to Labor since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 43.4%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Cessnock Surrounds

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 54.6Lab 55.6Lab 60.5Lab +4.9
Labor37.6%37.8%43.4%+5.6
Coalition23.2%25.5%16.3%-9.2
Greens8.7%10.6%7.4%-3.2
One Nation20.3%9.7%17.1%+7.4
Independents0.0%8.0%0.6%-7.3
Others10.2%8.3%15.1%+6.8

2021 Census profile

IndicatorCessnock SurroundsTypical area
Median age4239
Median household income ($/week)$1,814$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %15.4%21.4%
No religion %46.2%44.7%
Renting (all) %10.1%27.2%
Owned outright %41.5%32.7%
Born overseas %8.8%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %3.0%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,145 (7,017 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Cessnock HUNTER PPVCPPVC27%
EllalongOrdinary12%yes
MillfieldOrdinary9%yes
MulbringOrdinary8%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal7%
KitchenerOrdinary7%yes
WollombiOrdinary5%yes
Kurri Kurri HUNTER PPVCPPVC4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Hunter

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.