Skip to content

How Bunyip - Garfield voted

SA2 area in Victoria · federal division: La Trobe · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Bunyip - Garfield favoured Coalition 59.2% (v Labor 40.8%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 3.9 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 43.2%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Bunyip - Garfield

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 63.6Coal 63.1Coal 59.2Lab +3.9
Labor25.1%22.2%26.6%+4.4
Coalition51.2%47.2%43.2%-4.0
Greens5.9%9.3%9.9%+0.7
One Nation9.2%7.8%10.9%+3.1
Independents3.5%0.0%0.0%+0.0
Others5.0%13.5%9.3%-4.3

2021 Census profile

IndicatorBunyip - GarfieldTypical area
Median age4039
Median household income ($/week)$1,897$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %13.7%21.4%
No religion %48.7%44.7%
Renting (all) %12.4%27.2%
Owned outright %36.7%32.7%
Born overseas %10.8%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %4.6%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,868 (7,482 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
PostalDeclaration: Postal19%
BunyipOrdinary17%yes
Pakenham LA TROBE PPVCPPVC12%
GarfieldOrdinary10%yes
TynongOrdinary7%yes
Warragul LA TROBE PPVCPPVC7%
Nar Nar GoonOrdinary6%yes
MaryknollOrdinary6%yes

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in La Trobe

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.