Skip to content

How Braidwood voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Eden-Monaro · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Braidwood favoured Labor 59.6% (v Coalition 40.4%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 1.4 points to the Coalition since 2022. Labor led first preferences with 42.6%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Braidwood

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredLab 52.6Lab 60.9Lab 59.6Coal +1.4
Labor37.9%41.7%42.6%+0.9
Coalition42.8%30.9%29.1%-1.8
Greens11.9%11.3%12.6%+1.4
One Nation0.0%4.5%8.2%+3.6
Independents3.6%3.5%3.8%+0.3
Others3.8%8.1%3.8%-4.4

2021 Census profile

IndicatorBraidwoodTypical area
Median age5139
Median household income ($/week)$1,429$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %24.1%21.4%
No religion %49.5%44.7%
Renting (all) %14.9%27.2%
Owned outright %50.4%32.7%
Born overseas %13.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %5.5%12.5%

Usual residents: 4,343 (3,533 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
BraidwoodOrdinary23%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal20%
Braidwood CentralOrdinary15%yes
Queanbeyan EDEN-MONARO PPVCPPVC10%
Majors CreekOrdinary6%yes
Goulburn EDEN-MONARO PPVCPPVC5%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll5%
TaragoOrdinary4%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Eden-Monaro

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.