Skip to content

How Artarmon voted

SA2 area in New South Wales · federal division: Bradfield · federal elections 2019, 2022, 2025

At the 2025 federal election, residents of Artarmon favoured Labor 52.4% (v Coalition 47.6%) on a two-party-preferred basis, 2.0 points to Labor since 2022. Coalition led first preferences with 31.7%.

View on the AtlasSee the swing mapFind areas like Artarmon

Results by election

Estimated by where residents live; first preferences in %, swing in percentage points
201920222025Swing 2022→25
Two-party preferredCoal 56.8Lab 50.4Lab 52.4Lab +2.0
Labor27.5%23.0%23.6%+0.6
Coalition49.7%36.1%31.7%-4.4
Greens13.7%9.0%9.9%+0.9
One Nation0.0%1.2%1.6%+0.4
Independents3.8%25.0%30.6%+5.6
Others5.2%5.6%2.5%-3.1

2021 Census profile

IndicatorArtarmonTypical area
Median age3739
Median household income ($/week)$2,420$1,753
Bachelor degree or higher %56.4%21.4%
No religion %45.8%44.7%
Renting (all) %50.2%27.2%
Owned outright %24.9%32.7%
Born overseas %51.5%23.6%
Born in non-English-speaking country %44.3%12.5%

Usual residents: 9,406 (7,286 aged 18+). "Typical area" is the median across all areas.

Where residents voted in 2025

Polling placeTypeShare of residents' votesIn this area
Artarmon CentralOrdinary30%yes
Willoughby BRADFIELD PPVCPPVC19%
ArtarmonOrdinary17%yes
PostalDeclaration: Postal14%
Chatswood BRADFIELD PPVCPPVC7%
AbsentDeclaration: Absent3%
Pre-PollDeclaration: Pre-Poll3%
Crows Nest BRADFIELD PPVCPPVC1%

Top polling places by estimated votes from this area, including postal and other declaration votes.

Other areas in Bradfield

Sources: Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) federal election results and votes-by-SA1 files, 2019–2025; Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Australian Statistical Geography Standard Edition 3 boundaries and 2021 Census DataPacks. Both © Commonwealth of Australia, used under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Area results are estimates of how residents voted, not official counts — see the methods. Built 2 November 2026. Spotted an error? Tell us.